Mamata Adhikari has 20 years in aged care: starting as a Personal Care Assistant (PCA) and now working as an operations manager. From where she sits, approving or overriding facility-level admissions decisions, she’s seen a pattern form.
Potential residents are being turned away – and not for the reasons you might initially expect.
An invisible hole in a well-intentioned system
While the intent of the post-Royal Commission accountability framework was to protect residents’ rights, a different kind of harm is emerging. It’s harder to see and slower to name, but the flow on effects are far reaching.
“When the facility manager and the clinical manager reject a resident for whatever reason,” Adhikari explains, “it comes to the operations manager and we have to do a final review: agree or disagree.”
The pattern that’s often coming across her desk is that residents with complex needs – antipsychotic use, self-harm history, suicidal ideation – are being declined.
“A lot of the time I’m seeing residents being turned away,” Adhikari shares. “Not because we are not capable of looking after them, but we’re very scared that the commission is going to be after us.”
The real threat of non-compliance
Staff assessing new residents aren’t afraid of the care load – they’re afraid of what an Aged Care Quality Commission visit might find if something goes wrong. Their fear comes from further downstream, located in the pressures of maintaining adequate documentation and RNs who are already spread so thin.
“There will be no perfect resident,” Adhikari reflects. “We have to look after these people… the hospital would give that much level of attention, but we are not acute.”
The admissions pattern reveals some of the reality that aged care is being asked to hold – and what it isn’t resourced enough to replicate. Because the residents who are turned away don’t disappear. They take up acute beds or they go nowhere, creating even more strain on an already bulging system.
The battle to balance compliance with care
In the tension of aged care reforms there’s plenty of positive changes that have genuinely improved different aspects of resident care. But the tightening of compliance demands is starting to create cracks that affect everyone, from PCAs to residents and everyone in between.
Providers being asked to be accountable without adequate workforce, documentation support, or realistic staffing ratios yields a new type of harm. One that begins long before any care has been delivered.
So if admission decisions are being shaped more by compliance fear than clinical capability, what does that mean for the residents who need us most? And what responsibility do we have to name it? These are the questions leaders need to be asking – not just of themselves and their teams, but of the Commission, too.
